The truth is much harsher than Putin would have us know

(See part I...)

Munich meeting showed Putin presented nothing but the analysis of the existing international relationship. He expressed nothing but his concern and disagreement with other countries policies affecting negatively his own country.  Also, absolutely nothing was mentioned about the eventual collation of the East and the West. Nothing was said concerning the outburst of the cold war between the countries or the rights of the western countries living according to existing values. No declarations relating to nuclear actions. No territorial claims against one another.

Western indignation is understandable. Indignation and negative attitude towards the president were provoked by Putin’s frankness. He told them the truth of things as they are. He expressed his concern towards the western perception of the surrounding world and the system of the international relationship as a whole.

It is doubtful, to my mind, that Putin’s truth would affect somehow further big stride in the development of relations with the West, not to speak of the new internal policy and new attitude towards international relationships (Putin can do nothing. He is a puny sort of a man, a poor fellow, said Pyotr Mamonov, an actor and musician with cult status in Russia when calling the society to wake up). Promoters of the liberal concepts occupying different posts in the administration, the government and legislative organs prevail. Head of the presidential administration   would talk a lot of piffle hidden behind “sovereign democracy”. Medvedev, potential candidate for the position of the President, holds the same attitude of mind.

Munich Putin’s speech cannot be regarded as having desirable effect and is qualified as incomplete. Only half of the truth was mentioned. The other half, God knows why, was declined to put on the agenda.

Nothing stings like the truth. The USA did not stop their war against Russia. The first strike against the sworn enemy occurred in 1989 – 1991. The USA launched the other, “final battle” (to their mind!!!) immediately after the first blow. We are getting the impression that Russia is compared to Cartagena posing potential danger which should be overcome any way. Roman Punic analogy is subjective and is possible only until it concerns the complete submission.

Administration of the White House is afraid first of all about Russia’ soon recovery. If you delve deeper into the history and take the events of 1204 as the basis you will observe Russia has characteristic features of Constantinople or better to say the Third Rome than of Cartagena. That is why Russia should be crushed in the bud.

Destruction of the Orthodox Church was assigned a high priority being the core component contributing to revival of Russia (Brzezinski, ideologist of the liberal wing on pages of the daily newspaper “Независимая газета” (“Independent Newspaper”) of November, 1998 published till present). With the same frankness, probably too much firm in his convictions he spoke about the necessity of the destruction of the Orthodox Church as the only way out helping Russia become truly liberal and be independent from the new collation of the East and the West…

What a stupidity to judge only by words demonstrating the impossibility of new ideological collation of Russia and the West. Speaking of the Kremlin existing governing body, lack of any desire and possibility to oppose the West would probably be the most correct answer the commentators could ever give. So – called ideological collation of Russia and the West as part of the millenary war between Russia and the West was not committed to oblivion within several hundreds of years with the exception of Bolshevik – communist regime period. Collation came up with a bang after 1991. But the other problem is that the governors like Yeltsin or Putin did not even acknowledge or realize the possibility of waging an almost uninterrupted war against their country. They did not lift a finger to help their country to escape from this war. Thus, the West may profit from having the full spectrum of political, ideological, financial resources whereas Russia’s only way out of the created situation is to rely on menservants and common people having faith and hope  toward God which is not of minor importance, though.

Bright “liberal future”

Russia stands at the parting and has to choose the direction. Social and economical changes occurring the last five – six years, political stability, overcoming the difficulties connected to Caucasus problem and revival of the national identity at some level reviving the hope in people’s minds encouraging them to seek an answer to the question “What’s in store for us”?

Investigation of chaos, caused by liberal changes of the 90ties and the western scenario encourage people seek an answer to the question of their identity (“Who I am?”, “who we are?”) and life (“What is the purpose living on earth?”) lying hidden behind true values. Even the part of the discouraged by the results of the liberal changes elite as well as those who were successful to figure out the intentions of the Russia’s liberal “friends” as well as those acknowledging identity of the liberalism and the communism fell to agree to the impossibility to escape the abyss without Truth.

Russia has to choose between to be or not to be. If Russia follows liberalization path, one will compare Russia to Aztecs, Incans or Geto - Dacian civilization. Liberalism’s only purpose is destroying the identity as well as the values characteristic of any nation, culture or civilization helping to find personal fulfillment. Any liberal change contributes to the loss of the characteristic identity having a tendency to become transformed into an indiscrete mass based on only anatomical “values” reminding of humankind past. As for liberalism, the human “value” equals the value of a domestic animal bred at the cattle farm where the power of thought and consciousness do not require exceptional abilities. (It is worth observing that our farm is nothing as compared to the western one. The westerns stuff the cattle with all sorts of   chemical additives to obtain maximum efficiency from it).

Those who think that liberalism is a chance to revive their economic, politic and geopolitical performances contributing to return to super-power status, they are severely mistaken because it is impossible anyway even if Russia looses all its ideological and propagandistic resources as well as “cultural” influence. The west will never refuse to monopolize. Russia will agree on the inferior apprenticeship status and will remain so for the period of at least forty - fifty years under western surveillance the moment Russia declares acceptance of the liberal “values” as well as transformation in the western style. Western friends will govern, decide and count the steps towards the “bright future” (the same is practiced in the countries – new members of EU and the NATO and the countries of the Central and Eastern Europe). Will so – called Russian Federation western “teachers” allow Russia become the super power or at least the regional center competing with the interests of the American Empire (political, ideological, economical and cultural embodiment of the liberalism), Eastern Europe, the East or the Pacific Ocean?

Maybe, that is the case of an optimist scenario disabling the western “teachers” to proceed according to the methodology of the 90ties that saved the country from disappearance helping Russia preserve its territorial unit. It should be noted Russia is not a mere Hungary or Poland for the West. Russia is not only the country belonging to different cultural tradition and civilization but also the heiress (at least for the time being!) of what was political, ideological, economical, and cultural embodiment of Orthodox or Byzantine civilization. Taking Serbia as the example, West showed a strong dislike for reminiscences and the past, and the countries ready to revive ontologically opposed to misanthropic ideas thoughts and perception of the world. West’s only aim is to stamp all the countries out of existence.

Russia is currently thought of as a potential enemy of the West because of its exceptional resources (the Orthodox tradition, historical tradition, imperial tradition, cultural tradition, technological abilities, military abilities, economical abilities, territorial abilities, natural resources) possessing appropriate properties to serve the Orthodox that is Byzantine civilization.

Liberalism serves two purposes: first it is a mechanism contributing to denationalization and dehumanization like in Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania cases; the second one is its contribution towards the wiping out like in Russia case. “It is better for Russia to be a part of the USA…” said leader of the Democratic Union Valeria Novodvorskaya, famous for her liberal “mind, honor and dignity”.  She was appreciated for her positive attitude and hard work in the field of civism and promotion of the ‘human freedom”. She was offered financial support from the numerous western funds and organizations.

(“Triumph of the liberal values deserves slaying of three milliards of people” is another famous phrase giving additional meaning to the liberalism. Lenin, Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot are nothing as compared to existing connotation of liberalism. It’s a groove! That is the way liberalism expresses its “true” love towards people. Liberal – Bolshevik as well as Hitler’s Gulags appear to be nothing but prehistoric rudiments.)

To be continued…